Center for Coastal Monitoring and Assessment (CCMA)

Enter search criteria

NCCOS NOAA

You are here: Home › Ecosystems › Coral Reefs › A Biogeographic Assessment of Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary

Figures

 

Chapter 1

Chapter 2

Chapter 3

Chapter 4

Chapter 5

Chapter 6

Chapter 7

Introduction

Each of the figures found within the report can be accessed independently here. Adobe® Acrobat® Reader is needed to view these figures since they are in portable document format (PDF). Additionally, information on the maps below is provided in the Report.

PDFs

• Chapter1: Introduction
  • Figure 1.1.1. Map of the Channel Islands and the region of interest
  • Figure 1.1.2a. Spatial delineation of the Study Area
  • Figure 1.1.2b. Spatial delineation for Boundary Concept 1
  • Figure 1.1.2c. Spatial delineation for Boundary Concept 1a
  • Figure 1.1.2d. Spatial delineation for Boundary Concept 2
  • Figure 1.1.2e. Spatial delineation for Boundary Concept 3
  • Figure 1.1.2f. Spatial delineation for Boundary Concept 4
  • Figure 1.1.2g. Spatial delineation for Boundary Concept 5
  • Figure 1.3.1. Pelagic life-zones off southern CA
  • Figure 1.3.2. Benthic life-zones off southern CA
  • Figure 1.3.3. Range endpoints of invertebrates
  • Figure 1.3.4. Range endpoints of fishes
  • Figure 1.3.5. Range endpoints of shore and seabirds
  • Figure 1.3.6. Range endpoints of mammals
  • Figure 1.4.1. Hypothetical concepts and their ecological value
  • Figure 1.4.2. Trends in absolute and relative metrics and the OAI
  
  
• Chapter 2: Physical and Oceanographic Setting
  • Figure 2.1.1. Bathymetric and geologic features
  • Figure 2.4.1. Physiographic complexity along the CA coast
  • Figure 2.4.2a. Physiographic complexity within Boundary Concept 5
  • Figure 2.4.2b. Physiographic complexity within Boundary Concept 4
  • Figure 2.4.2c. Physiographic complexity within Boundary Concept 3
  • Figure 2.4.2d. Physiographic complexity within Boundary Concept 2
  • Figure 2.4.2e. Physiographic complexity within Boundary Concept 1
  • Figure 2.4.2f. Physiographic complexity within the Study Area
  • Figure 2.4.3a. Linear regression between concept area and mean complexity
  • Figure 2.4.3b. Linear regression between concept area and high complexity
  • Figure 2.5.1. Benthic habitat types for the marine waters off CA
  • Figure 2.5.2. Location of hard substrate from NMFS and MMS datasets
  • Figure 2.5.3. Benthic habitat types for the marine waters off southern CA
  • Figure 2.5.4. Regression of habitat diversity and total area
  • Figure 2.5.5. Evenness and richness estimates for habitat types
  • Figure 2.6.1. Distribution of benthic substrate types off southern CA
  • Figure 2.6.2. Distribution of bathymetric zones off southern CA
  • Figure 2.6.3. Regression of habitat evenness and total area
  • Figure 2.7.1. Seasonal mean sea surface temperature (Jan, Apr, Jul, Oct)
  • Figure 2.7.2. Sea surface temperature variance
  • Figure 2.7.3a. Interpolated SST grid from GMT for January 1993
  • Figure 2.7.3b. SST fronts identified from January 1993
  • Figure 2.7.4. Persistence of SST fronts through time
  • Figure 2.7.5. Areas with greatest SST front activity through time
  • Figure 2.7.6. Linear regression between concept area and persistence of SST fronts
  • Figure 2.7.7. Linear regression between concept area and frontal persistence
  • Figure 2.8.1. Mean ChlA (Oct 1997 – Dec 1999)
  • Figure 2.8.2. Interpolated mean ChlA (Oct 1997 – Dec 1999)
  • Figure 2.8.3. Interpolated mean ChlA off CA (Oct 1997 – Dec 1999)
  • Figure 2.8.4. Monthly mean ChlA for 1999
  • Figure 2.8.5a. Mean ChlA (Jan)
  • Figure 2.8.5b. Mean ChlA (Feb)
  • Figure 2.8.5c. Mean ChlA (Mar)
  • Figure 2.8.5d. Mean ChlA (Apr)
  • Figure 2.8.5e. Mean ChlA (May)
  • Figure 2.8.5f. Mean ChlA (Jun)
  • Figure 2.8.5g. Mean ChlA (Jul)
  • Figure 2.8.5h. Mean ChlA (Aug)
  • Figure 2.8.5i. Mean ChlA (Sep)
  • Figure 2.8.5j. Mean ChlA (Oct)
  • Figure 2.8.5k. Mean ChlA (Nov)
  • Figure 2.8.5l. Mean ChlA (Dec)
  • Figure 2.8.6a. Interpolated mean ChlA within Boundary Concept 5
  • Figure 2.8.6b. Interpolated mean ChlA within Boundary Concept 4
  • Figure 2.8.6c. Interpolated mean ChlA within Boundary Concept 3
  • Figure 2.8.6d. Interpolated mean ChlA within Boundary Concept 2
  • Figure 2.8.6e. Interpolated mean ChlA within Boundary Concept 1
  • Figure 2.8.6f. Interpolated mean ChlA within the Study Area
  • Figure 2.8.7. Linear regression between concept area and mean ChlA
  • Figure 2.8.8. Linear regression between total concept area and area of high ChlA
  • Figure 2.9.1. Distribution of SAV within CA
  • Figure 2.9.2a. Distribution of SAV within Boundary Concept 5
  • Figure 2.9.2b. Distribution of SAV within Boundary Concept 4
  • Figure 2.9.2c. Distribution of SAV within Boundary Concept 3
  • Figure 2.9.2d. Distribution of SAV within Boundary Concept 2
  • Figure 2.9.2e. Distribution of SAV within Boundary Concept 1
  • Figure 2.9.2f. Distribution of SAV within the Study Area
  • Figure 2.9.3. Linear regression between area of SAV and area of Boundary concepts
  • Figure 2.10.1. Kelp distribution based on aerial and multispectral surveys
  • Figure 2.10.2. Kelp distribution off southern CA
  • Figure 2.10.3. Regression of kelp area and total area of boundary concepts
  
  
• Chapter 3: Biogeography of Macroinvertebrates
  • Figure 3.1.1. CDFG commercial 10x10 nm fishery landings grids
  • Figure 3.1.2. Rock crab habitat suitability, CA
  • Figure 3.1.3. Rock crab habitat suitability, southern CA
  • Figure 3.1.4. Rock crab suitable habitat/area regression
  • Figure 3.1.5. Black abalone habitat suitability, southern CA
  • Figure 3.1.6. Black abalone CDFG commercial landings data
  • Figure 3.1.7. Black abalone suitable habitat/area regression
  • Figure 3.1.8. Red abalone habitat suitability, southern CA
  • Figure 3.1.9. Red abalone CDFG commercial landings data
  • Figure 3.1.10. Red abalone suitable habitat/area regession
  • Figure 3.1.11. White abalone habitat suitability, southern CA
  • Figure 3.1.12. White abalone CDFG commercial landings data
  • Figure 3.1.13. White abalone suitable habitat/area regression
  • Figure 3.1.14. California market squid habitat suitability, CA
  • Figure 3.1.15. California market squid abundance NMFS trawls
  • Figure 3.1.16. California market squid habitat suitability, southern CA
  • Figure 3.1.17. California market squid suitable habitat/area regression
  • Figure 3.1.18. Sheep crab habitat suitability, CA
  • Figure 3.1.19. Sheep crab CDFG commercial landings data
  • Figure 3.1.20. Sheep crab habitat suitability, southern CA
  • Figure 3.1.21. Sheep crab suitable habitat/area regression
  • Figure 3.1.22. Spot shrimp habitat suitability, CA
  • Figure 3.1.23. Spot shrimp CDFG commercial trap data
  • Figure 3.1.24. Spot shrimp CDFG commercial trawl data
  • Figure 3.1.25. Spot shrimp habitat suitability, southern CA
  • Figure 3.1.26. Spot shrimp suitable habitat/area regression
  • Figure 3.1.27. Ridgeback shrimp habitat suitability, CA
  • Figure 3.1.28. Ridgeback shrimp abundance, SCCWRP trawls
  • Figure 3.1.29. Ridgeback shrimp habitat suitability, southern CA
  • Figure 3.1.30. Ridgeback shrimp suitable habitat/area regression
  • Figure 3.1.31. California spiny lobster habitat suitability, CA
  • Figure 3.1.32. California spiny lobster CDFG commercial landings data
  • Figure 3.1.33. California spiny lobster habitat suitability, southern CA
  • Figure 3.1.34. California spiny lobster suitable habitat/area regression
  • Figure 3.1.35. California sea cucumber habitat suitability, CA
  • Figure 3.1.36. California sea cucumber abundance, SCCWRP trawls
  • Figure 3.1.37. California sea cucumber habitat suitability, southern CA
  • Figure 3.1.38. California sea cucumber suitable habitat/area regression
  • Figure 3.1.39. Warty sea cucumber habitat suitability, CA
  • Figure 3.1.40. Warty sea cucumber habitat suitability, southern CA
  • Figure 3.1.41. Warty sea cucumber suitable habitat/area regression
  • Figure 3.1.42. Red sea urchin habitat suitability, CA
  • Figure 3.1.43. Red sea urchin habitat suitability, southern CA
  • Figure 3.1.44. Red sea urchin suitable habitat/area regression
  • Figure 3.1.45. Purple sea urchin habitat suitability, CA
  • Figure 3.1.46. Purple sea urchin habitat suitability, southern CA
  • Figure 3.1.47. Purple sea urchin suitable habitat/area regression
  • Figure 3.2.1. Invertebrate diversity, SCCWRP trawls
  • Figure 3.2.2. Location of site groups, SCCWRP trawls
  • Figure 3.2.3a. Invertebrate diversity, concept 5
  • Figure 3.2.3b. Invertebrate diversity, concept 4
  • Figure 3.2.3c. Invertebrate diversity, concept 3
  • Figure 3.2.3d. Invertebrate diversity, concept 2
  • Figure 3.2.3e. Invertebrate diversity, concept 1
  • Figure 3.2.3f. Invertebrate diversity, study area
  
  
• Chapter 4: Biogeography of Marine Fishes
  • Figure 4.1.1. Adult thresher shark habitat suitability, CA
  • Figure 4.1.2. Juvenile thresher shark habitat suitability, CA
  • Figure 4.1.3. Adult thresher shark habitat suitability, southern CA
  • Figure 4.1.4. Adult thresher shark suitable habitat/area regression
  • Figure 4.1.5. Juvenile thresher shark habitat suitability, southern CA
  • Figure 4.1.6. Juvenile thresher shark suitable habitat/area regression
  • Figure 4.1.7. Adult tope habitat suitability, CA
  • Figure 4.1.8. Juvenile tope habitat suitability, CA
  • Figure 4.1.9. Adult tope habitat suitability, southern CA
  • Figure 4.1.10. Adult tope suitable habitat/area regression
  • Figure 4.1.11. Juvenile tope habitat suitability, southern CA
  • Figure 4.1.12. Juvenile tope suitable habitat/area regression
  • Figure 4.1.13. Adult leopard shark habitat suitability, CA
  • Figure 4.1.14. Adult leopard shark habitat suitability, southern CA
  • Figure 4.1.15. Adult leopard shark suitable habitat/area regression
  • Figure 4.1.16. Pacific angel shark habitat suitability, CA
  • Figure 4.1.17. Pacific angel shark habitat suitability, southern CA
  • Figure 4.1.18. Pacific angel shark suitable habitat/area regression
  • Figure 4.1.19. Adult bocaccio habitat suitability, CA
  • Figure 4.1.20. Juvenile bocaccio habitat suitability, CA
  • Figure 4.1.21. Adult bocaccio habitat suitability, southern CA
  • Figure 4.1.22. Adult bocaccio suitable habitat/area regression
  • Figure 4.1.23. Juvenile bocaccio habitat suitability, southern CA
  • Figure 4.1.24. Juvenile bocaccio suitable habitat/area regression
  • Figure 4.1.25. Adult cowcod habitat suitability, CA
  • Figure 4.1.26. Juvenile cowcod habitat suitability, CA
  • Figure 4.1.27. Adult cowcod habitat suitability, southern CA
  • Figure 4.1.28. Adult cowcod suitable habitat/area regression
  • Figure 4.1.29. Juvenile cowcod habitat suitability, southern CA
  • Figure 4.1.30. Juvenile cowcod suitable habitat/area regression
  • Figure 4.1.31. Adult lingcod habitat suitability, CA
  • Figure 4.1.32. Juvenile lingcod habitat suitability, CA
  • Figure 4.1.33. Adult lingcod habitat suitability, southern CA
  • Figure 4.1.34. Adult lingcod suitable habitat/area regression
  • Figure 4.1.35. Juvenile lingcod habitat suitability, southern CA
  • Figure 4.1.36. Juvenile lingcod suitable habitat/area regression
  • Figure 4.1.37. Giant seabass habitat suitability, CA
  • Figure 4.1.38. Giant seabass habitat suitability, southern CA
  • Figure 4.1.39. Giant seabass suitable habitat/area regression
  • Figure 4.1.40. California sheephead habitat suitability, CA
  • Figure 4.1.41. California sheephead CDFG commercial landings data
  • Figure 4.1.42. California sheephead habitat suitability, southern CA
  • Figure 4.1.43. California sheephead suitable habitat/area regression
  • Figure 4.1.44. California halibut habitat suitability, CA
  • Figure 4.1.45. California halibut abundance, SCCWRP trawls
  • Figure 4.1.46. California halibut CDFG commercial landings data
  • Figure 4.1.47. California halibut habitat suitability, southern CA
  • Figure 4.1.48. California halibut suitable habitat/area regression
  • Figure 4.2.1a. Fish diversity by site, RecFIN
  • Figure 4.2.1b. Fish diversity by 5 min grid, RecFIN
  • Figure 4.2.2a. Fish diversity by site, SCCWRP
  • Figure 4.2.2b. Fish diversity by 5 min grid, SCCWRP
  • Figure 4.2.3a. Fish diversity by site, NMFS
  • Figure 4.2.3b. Fish diversity by 5 min grid, NMFS
  • Figure 4.2.4a. Fish diversity by site, PISCO/VRG
  • Figure 4.2.4b. Fish diversity by 5 min grid, PISCO/VRG
  • Figure 4.2.5a. Composite fish diversity by 5 min grid
  • Figure 4.2.5b. Composite fish diversity by 5 min grid, sampling effort
  • Figure 4.2.6a. Fish site groups 1-3, RecFIN
  • Figure 4.2.6b. Fish site groups 4-6, RecFIN
  • Figure 4.2.6c. Fish site groups 7-9, RecFIN
  • Figure 4.2.6d. Fish site groups 10-12, RecFIN
  • Figure 4.2.6e. Fish site groups 13-15, RecFIN
  • Figure 4.2.6f. Fish site groups 16-18, RecFIN
  • Figure 4.2.7a. Fish site groups in southern CA
  • Figure 4.2.7b. Fish site groups around Anacapa Island
  • Figure 4.2.8. Fish site groups in southern CA, SCCWRP
  • Figure 4.2.9. Fish site groups in southern CA, NMFS
  • Figure 4.2.10. Fish site groups in southern CA, PISCO/VRG
  • Figure 4.2.11a. Composite fish diversity, Concept 5
  • Figure 4.2.11b. Composite fish diversity, Concept 4
  • Figure 4.2.11c. Composite fish diversity, Concept 3
  • Figure 4.2.11d. Composite fish diversity, Concept 2
  • Figure 4.2.11e. Composite fish diversity, Concept 1
  • Figure 4.2.11f. Composite fish diversity, study area
  • Figure 4.3.1. Location of CalCOFI bongo net surveys
  • Figure 4.3.2. CalCOFi bongo net survey, effort
  • Figure 4.3.3. California halibut mean larval abundance, CA
  • Figure 4.3.4. Bocaccio mean larval abundance, CA
  • Figure 4.3.5. Pacific sardine mean larval abundance, CA
  • Figure 4.3.6. Northern anchovy mean larval abundance, CA
  
  
• Chapter 5: Biogeography of Marine Birds
  • Figure 5.1.1. Ashy storm-petrel, at-sea densities
  • Figure 5.1.2. Ashy storm-petrel, colony counts
  • Figure 5.1.3. Brown pelican, at-sea densities
  • Figure 5.1.4. Brown pelican, colony counts
  • Figure 5.1.5. Double-crested cormorant, at-sea densities
  • Figure 5.1.6. Double-crested cormorant, colony counts
  • Figure 5.1.7. Brandt’s cormorant, at-sea densities
  • Figure 5.1.8. Brandt’s cormorant, colony counts
  • Figure 5.1.9. Pelagic cormorant, at-sea densities
  • Figure 5.1.10. Pelagic cormorant, colony counts
  • Figure 5.1.11. Western snowy plover, designated critical hab- Pac coast
  • Figure 5.1.12. Black oystercatcher, colony counts
  • Figure 5.1.13. California least tern, max breeding pairs
  • Figure 5.1.14. Pigeon guillemot, at-sea densities
  • Figure 5.1.15. Pigeon guillemot, colony counts
  • Figure 5.1.16. Xantus’s murrelet, at-sea densities
  • Figure 5.1.17. Xantus’s murrelet, colony counts
  • Figure 5.1.18. Xantus’s murrelet, Anacapa Is. colony counts
  • Figure 5.1.19. Xantus’s murrelet, San Clemente Is. colony counts
  • Figure 5.1.20. Xantus’s murrelet, San Miguel Is. colony counts
  • Figure 5.1.21. Xantus’s murrelet, Santa Barbara Is. colony counts
  • Figure 5.1.22. Xantus’s murrelet, Santa Catalina Is. colony counts
  • Figure 5.1.23. Xantus’s murrelet, Santa Cruz Is. colony counts
  • Figure 5.1.24. Xantus’s murrelet, telemetry relocations
  • Figure 5.1.25. Cassin’s auklet, at-sea densities
  • Figure 5.1.26. Cassin’s auklet, colony counts
  • Figure 5.2.1a. Distribution of marine bird survey efforts and sightings
  • Figure 5.2.1b. Total amount of sea bird survey effort
  • Figure 5.2.2. Estimated bird diversity
  • Figure 5.2.3a. Overlay of estimated marine bird diversity- Study Area
  • Figure 5.2.3b. Overlay of estimated marine bird diversity- Concept 1
  • Figure 5.2.3c. Overlay of estimated marine bird diversity- Concept 2
  • Figure 5.2.3d. Overlay of estimated marine bird diversity- Concept 3
  • Figure 5.2.3e. Overlay of estimated marine bird diversity- Concept 4
  • Figure 5.2.3f. Overlay of estimated marine bird diversity- Concept 5
  • Figure 5.2.4. Regression of mean bird diversity and concept area
  • Figure 5.2.5. Regression of the area mean bird diversity and concept area
  
  
• Chapter 6: Biogeography of Marine Mammals
  • Figure 6.1.1. Survey tracks for SWFS0C
  • Figure 6.1.2. Survey tracks for SWFSC off central/southern CA
  • Figure 6.1.3. Survey tracks for SWFSC ship surveys off southern CA
  • Figure 6.1.4. Survey effort of marine mammals
  • Figure 6.1.5. Survey effort of marine mammals off central/southern CA
  • Figure 6.1.6. Blue whale, sightings and group size
  • Figure 6.1.7. Bottlenose dolphin, sightings and group size
  • Figure 6.1.8. Bottlenose dolphin (coastal population), encounter rates
  • Figure 6.1.9. Common dolphin (unidentified), sightings and group size
  • Figure 6.1.10. Long-beaked common dolphin, sightings and group size
  • Figure 6.1.11. Short-beaked common dolphin, sightings and group size
  • Figure 6.1.12. Gray whale, sightings and group size
  • Figure 6.1.13. Humpback whale, sightings and group size
  • Figure 6.1.14. Killer whale, sightings and group size
  • Figure 6.1.15. Pacific white-sided dolphin, sightings and group size
  • Figure 6.1.16. Risso’s dolphin, sightings and group size
  • Figure 6.1.17. Dall’s porpoise, sightings and group size
  • Figure 6.1.18. Fin whale, sightings and group size
  • Figure 6.1.19. Harbor porpoise, sightings and group size
  • Figure 6.1.20. Minke whale, sightings and group size
  • Figure 6.1.21. Northern right whale dolphin, sightings and group size
  • Figure 6.2.1a. California sea lion, Anacapa Is. max individuals
  • Figure 6.2.1b. California sea lion, San Clemente Is. max individuals
  • Figure 6.2.1c. California sea lion, San Miguel Is. max individuals
  • Figure 6.2.1d. California sea lion, San Nicolas Is. max individuals
  • Figure 6.2.1e. California sea lion, Santa Barbara Is. max individuals
  • Figure 6.2.1f. California sea lion, Santa Catalina Is. max individuals
  • Figure 6.2.1g. California sea lion, Santa Cruz Is. max individuals
  • Figure 6.2.1h. California sea lion, Santa Rosa Is. max individuals
  • Figure 6.2.2a. California sea lion, Anacapa Is. max pups
  • Figure 6.2.2b. California sea lion, San Clemente Is. max pups
  • Figure 6.2.2c. California sea lion, San Miguel Is. max pups
  • Figure 6.2.2d. California sea lion, San Nicolas Is. max pups
  • Figure 6.2.2e. California sea lion, Santa Barbara Is. max pups
  • Figure 6.2.2f. California sea lion, Gull Is. max pups
  • Figure 6.2.3. Harbor seal, total individuals counted for SWFSC census
  • Figure 6.2.4. Harbor seal, total individuals counted for CDFG census
  • Figure 6.2.5a. Northern elephant seal, San Clemente Is. max individuals
  • Figure 6.2.5b. Northern elephant seal, San Miguel Is. max individuals
  • Figure 6.2.5c. Northern elephant seal, San Nicolas Is. max individuals
  • Figure 6.2.5d. Northern elephant seal, Santa Barbara Is. max individuals
  • Figure 6.2.5e. Northern elephant seal, Santa Rosa Is. max individuals
  • Figure 6.2.6a. Northern elephant seal, San Clemente Is. max pups
  • Figure 6.2.6b. Northern elephant seal, San Miguel Is. max pups
  • Figure 6.2.6c. Northern elephant seal, San Nicolas Is. max pups
  • Figure 6.2.6d. Northern elephant seal, Santa Barbara Is. max pups
  • Figure 6.2.6e. Northern elephant seal, Santa Rosa Is. max pups
  • Figure 6.2.7a. Southern sea otter, total individual counts for Fall 2001
  • Figure 6.2.7b. Southern sea otter, total individual counts for Spring 2002
  • Figure 6.2.8. Southern sea otter, expansion of range
  • Figure 6.2.9. Southern sea otter, moving average of Spring survey counts
  
  
• Chapter 7: Integration
  • Figure 7.2.1. Broad-scale distribution of fish and invertebrate highly suitable habitat
  • Figure 7.2.2. Overlap of fish and invertebrate highly suitable habitat off southern CA
  • Figure 7.2.3. Broad-scale distribution of bird and mammal co-occurrence
  • Figure 7.2.4. Bird and mammal co-occurrence off southern CA
  • Figure 7.2.5. Broad-scale distribution of the composite spatial integration for bird, fish, invertebrate and mammal data
  • Figure 7.2.6. Composite spatial integration of bird, fish, invertebrate, and mammal data off southern CA

Disclaimer

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Biogeography Branch produced this data DVD. The NOAA Biogeography Branch does not guarantee the accuracy of the geographic features or attributes. Please see the metadata records for each data set for complete information on the source, limitations, and proper use.

---

Home | Accessibility | Contact us | Search | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Employees

---

Web site owner: Center for Coastal Monitoring and Assessment
This page was last updated on July 31, 2009 . 
Send comments and/or suggestions to the the web team

US DOC / NOAA / NOS / NCCOS